I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the role of sexism
and its attendant understanding of women in the structures of white supremacy.
This has been an issue nagging me sinceour first discussions of lynching
justified on the basis of “protecting our women” (the possessive phrasing is
really important here, I think) from the mythical spectre of the marauding,
fiendish black man. Something about the idea that these murders were motivated
in large part by a genuine desire to protect wives and sisters and daughters
from the pain of sexual violence, particclarly that inflicted at the hands of
black men, just didn’t ring true to me—there seemed to me to be an element of
the dehumization fo white women as well, but I couldn’t put my finger on it. I
realized, however, that this professed motivation seems hollow precisely
because white women often weren’t protected from sexual violence—as long as it
was by a white man. I wondered how many members of lynch mobs or witnesses of
spectacle killings had themsleves raped a white woman and whether this
contradiction would have ever given them pause or even occurred to them. But I
realized that if you view it through this lens, that the fundamental issue
wasn’t the rape of a white woman, but the rape of a white woman by a black
man—something of a theft of what rightfully belongs to white men—it casts the
structures of white supremacy as a struggle between black and white men, with
women (both black and white) as merely objects to be weilded as pawns. It
becomes an issue of ownership—ownership, I think, of birthright, in which women
functioned merely as incubators of that birthright, objects themselves. The
rape of a white woman, then, is a usurpation of the white male right to white
offspring—the theft of an object to be put to use by the “other side” (this
seems consistent with the complete social acceptibilty of sexual violence
toward black women and girls, because white men “owned” them as well). This
dynamic is best illusitrated for me in the scene in To Kill A Mockingbird in where, rather than having been raped by
Tom Robinson as was alleged, it became clear that Mayella Ewell had instead
made sexual advances toward Tom and her father, catching her, had severely
beaten her. It was never about Mayella’s protection from violence—her advances
were entirely consensual, and it was her father who responded by beating her.
Rather, this (at least in the mind of Bob Ewell) was a struggle between Bob
Ewell and Tom, by white man against black men, played out on the bodies of
women.
No comments:
Post a Comment