In a 2015
report by the Century Foundation entitled “Architecture of Segregation,” they
conclude, based on an analysis US census data and various other objective
meaures, that racial segregation has in fact increased since 2000, and without
intervention will continue to do so, as the logical outcome of intentional
policy decisions. They conclude that concentrated poverty (defined in the study
as a census tract where more that forty percent of residents live below the
poverty line) has been steadily increasing for years, but one factor in this
trend has gone unnoticed—the return to raically determined areas of
concentrated poverty. After the national conern about poverty and crime in
urban “ghettos” and barrios of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, federal policy and
improvement in the economy lifted many people out of poverty and concern faded
and was thought by some to be largely a thing of the past. However, as concern
faded interest dropped, and in the next decade concentrated povery gradually
crept back. This was prompted in part by white flight to outer suburbs, a
reaction to the breaking up of large public housing developments in the inner
city and their residents’ move to the inner suburbs, that took their tax
dollars with them. But more blatatnt forms of racism prevented African
Americans from following them to the outer suburbs. Many wealthy subdivisions
passed zoning ordinances that prevented the construction of public housing, or
even apartments at all, while others mandated a minimum house size to prevent
lower income people from moving in. Other factors, such as low-income housing
tax credits discrimatorily applied to majority minority neighborhoods and
Section 8 vouchers that restrict the poor to concentrated neighboorhoods where
landlords will accept them, also add to the again increasing problem of
race-based segregation. This is the predictable and inevitable result of
policies that effectively framed racially-correlated issues in financial terms
and allow for the de facto preservation of segregation long after it was
eradicated in the law. This is entirely consistent with America’s long history
of framing the subjugation of black people in slightly more positive and less
offensive terms than is the reality at the time, allowing them to inflict all
the abuse they want to without ever having to come to terms with themsleves for
it—like framing chattle slavery as a benevolent necessity, casting racial
segregation in thinly-veiled economic terms, is the nation’s means of
justifying, to ourselves and to the world, the ultimately unjustifiable.
No comments:
Post a Comment