Dr.
Imani Michelle Scott is a scholar, consultant, practitioner and specialist in
the areas of human communication, conflict analysis and conflict resolution. Presently,
Dr. Scott is a Professor of Communication for the internationally-acclaimed
university for art and design, the Savannah College of Art and Design (SCAD).
At SCAD, Dr. Scott teaches courses in Intercultural Communication and Public
Speaking and facilitates the University’s Faculty Development Program. (Huffington Post Bio) In her article/Blog It’s Called “Battered Race
Syndrome.” Or, Something Like That, she investigates the continuous traumatic stress created
by the racist society that she lives in. While this concept is important the most
significant part of this article/blog that I hope to talk about is her question
“Why are we made to feel guilty about being angry?”. This question in my estimation directly
relates back to our class in reference to the idea of the investment in white
supremacy. Illustrated throughout the
evolution of African American activism, it is clear that regardless of the time
period, systematic control has been an important factor contesting progress
both through legal standing and societal improvement. But in today’s view within African American
activism we see this theory that African Americans are holding too much of a
stigma towards white Americans due to past experiences. This is without a doubt a fallacy and
demonstrates a clear misunderstanding of the depth and length of the African
American struggle. Without this wide
spread context within American history, White Americans often cannot comprehend
systematic racism when it is clearly in front of them. As a result, according to Scotts article,
white civilians stereotype the idea of the “angry black woman and angry
black which are projections that white people put on us to control us and
validate their violence against us.”
This all relates back to the investment in white supremacy that can be conscious
or unconscious in our current racial climate.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/imani-michelle-scott-phd/its-called-battered-race-_b_11704844.html
I totally agree with the points you made, and also think this issue plays into the "impertinence" that many people percieve, consciously or otherwise, as characterizing activism. There is an attitude implicit in this approach that holds the status quo as sufficient and even as right or ordanied, which takes offense at the impropriety and petulant "wineyness" of those attempting to change a perfectly natural and acceptible social order.
ReplyDeleteI also agree with the points in that both you and the article made. The perpetuation of the "angry black person" only allows their voices to continually be discounted.
ReplyDelete