From time to
time, Rhodes Singers will do a neat trick in which, instead of singing
something by Bach, Handel, or a random modern composer, our director will
decide that we should sing a spiritual. Now normally, Memphis musical heritage
aside, this represents a difficult thing for me and I imagine it does for many
other members of the choir as well. How could we possibly identify with texts
that were initially meant, if the vast majority of American choir directors can
be believed, to be subversive to the institution of slavery. It’s a story you
have likely heard before – “swing low sweet chariot coming to carry me home” as
a prayer for deliverance. So on and so forth for every popular spiritual in
circulation in the choral world. I’ve been in some sort of choir for most of my
life; at first spirituals like this were a fun break, when I became a bit more
aware they seemed more and more like appropriation.
Honestly they
still do seem like appropriation – but the spiritual we’ve been singing this
semester, “Wade in the Water” arranged by African American composer Rosephayne
Powell, has struck me as particularly powerful by virtue of its subversion: “Wade in the water, wade in the water
children, wade in the water, God’s gonna trouble the water.” The text has a
resounding ring to it – our director claimed it was a reference to escaping
slaves wading in creeks and rivers to throw pursuers off their trail. It spoke
to me as the hard slog of activism. I thought of the struggle of African
Americans to gain human rights under systematic slavery then segregation as
walking against a strong current. When it takes effort to even hold on to the
progress that has been made, taking a step forward and holding that new spot is
even harder. Given what we have learned about the American investment in white
superiority, this metaphor of wading against a harsh current is very potent.
Great post Roger. As a fellow member of Rhodes Singers and as someone who has sung countless spirituals in countless choirs during my life, I too have pondered the implications of using spirituals outside of their original contexts. Most conductors are far more concerned with musicality and any given spiritual's rehearsal process than with intent or possible appropriation involved in it's performance, and yet, those issues matter. I agree that our treatment of "Wade in the Water" has been respectful and effective, but the question of whether such an interpretation should be undertaken for a group like Rhodes Singers is certainly a question worth asking.
ReplyDelete