In the wake of the Charleston church massacre in June
2015, rumors began circulating that in an attempt to eliminate the confederate flag
from modern day use, Beyoncé and her husband, Jay Z, were intent of buying the
rights to the confederate flag in order to control its sell. This story began to gain much ground as
people everywhere praised Beyonce for attempting to eradicate such a graphic
symbol of hate. It was late revealed
however, that such a news story was indeed false, and that Beyonce and Jay Z
had no real intentions of buying the rights to the confederate flag.
This
rumor, despite its grandiose claim, circulated quickly due to its believable
context. This story came prior to
Beyonce’s release of Lemonade, yet people still associated her with signs of
activism. Had the story claimed that
anyone besides Beyonce had the intent to address white supremacy in this way,
then the believability factor would have dropped. When people think of Beyonce, they think of
her standing on a stage as the word “Feminist” flashes behind her, they think
of her confidence and charisma, and they think of her power. Beyonce and Jay Z purchasing the rights of
the confederate flag presents a story of a powerful and talented couple,
reclaiming the symbol used to spread intolerance and hatred. The fake article about such an occurrence is
not bold in its claim, rather it is important in that in links Beyonce, a
public, well admired figure with the idea of change. If Beyonce serves as the voice of a
generation and is then used to promote activist policies, then the activist
ideologies are able to spread further, because Beyonce herself has blessed said
beliefs and wisdom. Using Beyonce’s voice in the fake article highlights a form
of propaganda in that it gets young individuals to consider that if their idol
is set on leaving behind the confederate flag, then one is more likely to share
those same sentiments. The name of Beyonce has enough power and influence and
even a fake article has the ability to gain ground in terms of a call to
activism.
No comments:
Post a Comment