Capitalism was created to oppress. On paper, the economic
system originated with the intent to raise the standard of living for all
people without a specific focus on the less well-off (like socialism). Rather
than create a structure that redistributes wealth directly, capitalism was
created around the idea of free market principles, insisting that if good and
services can be provided and are desired, fair trades will be made between
groups. Though this is a simplified explanation, the ideologies of a
capitalistic market hold true: groups will have their stand of living raised
regardless of socio-economic status due to supply and demand theory.
Additionally, the role of government regulation in this theoretical model of
capitalism is minimal, only stepping in for legal parameters. The success of an
ideal free market is the theory behind this.
In actuality, however, capitalism serves to create a
zero-sum game, separating market “winners” and “losers”. The point must be made
that capitalism was never meant for a globalized market. Or rather, capitalism
was never intended to fit an economy in which large groups are separated by
unsurmountable gaps in quality of life and cultural barriers. Due to
colonialism and globalization, capitalism breeds corruption. Without “unreasonable”
government control, human rights violations occur daily. Basic human needs are
devalued in favor of prioritizing corporations, businesses, and global market
trade. The economic system enforced for centuries has been one that not only
values some lives over others based on geographic region, socio-economic
status, and personal idiosyncrasies (such as race, religion, gender, etc.), but
also profits off of those abuses.
In the US (and many Western countries), capitalism has bled
into every aspect of our lives, creating a culture of capitalism that would be
impossible to remove without dismantling the entire system of which we all
currently rely. By allowing this system of warped capitalism to continue to
abuse human beings through corrupt labor practices, subversive policies, and social
coercion, we are accepting the oppression experienced by all who encounter us.
That may sound extreme, but the treatment of foreign and domestic people cannot
be denied. In areas aside from the US and Westernized areas, colonization
continues to impact human interactions and contribute a root cause to global
poverty, pandemics, and environmental issues. In the US, individuals are defined
by their labor, refined to fit their assigned role, and isolated through false
individualism and combinations of hegemonic control (such as misogyny, racism, heteronormality
etc.).
The biggest obstacle I see activism, especially Black
activism, facing is the indisputable fact that the very system suggests that
their existence is inherently an anachronism if it does not serve the hegemonic
cause. The fact that many Black movements center around playing into the system
of control in order to gain rights is often more successful than other methods.
This should not be the case. If our society did not label people by their
labor, slavery would not have existed in the capacity in which it did. Slavery
has evolved into the modern oppression that we see today, with Black people
still thought of as blue-collar.
In saying that Black movements should not have to pander to the
White majority, I do not mean to suggest that these movements should not exist.
I think that all too often we are caught up in criticism rather than
recognition of the struggles people undergo throughout movements. As such, I
simply mean to suggest that the root issue is that justice has not and will not
be attained through capitalism.
I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiments; however, we face the problem of alternatives. What is considered a "good' alternative or rather an existing alternative. Marx suggested that "Communism," or whatever he meant by that statement, was the next stage of human, economic development; however, we always forget that Marx also stated that Capitalism is the best form of economy thus far created, which begs the question. Are we to strive for communism or something else entirely, and if so, is the dream of overcoming ideology even possible. For as you hint at, capitalism is pervasive. It infects everything, like any economic system before anywhere on the planet, whichever form it takes. Ultimately, are we able to make a global revolution of ideology??? I don't think we're able to yet.
ReplyDeleteExcellent post Atticus. I believe political economics must be a part of the discussion on dismantling institutional racism. @Brad, I think you were getting at the dilemma many activists face: do we tweak the current system to achieve more just outcomes, or do we replace (overthrow) the system entirely?
ReplyDeleteEither way, critiques of capitalism must be developed and understood. @Atticus, I agree that the competition necessary for capitalism creates winners and losers (haves and have-nots). For instance, a key economic facet of capitalism is a "healthy" level of unemployment. With a "healthy" level of unemployment, employers are able to keep their wages lower (at or around subsistence), because theoretically someone would always be willing to take the job at the lowest wage rather than go without any earnings. Historically and systemically blacks have been disenfranchised in our country, and we need to take a serious look at the economic forces maintaining racial disparities.
Atticus, I agree and support your notions on capitalism and the problematic antics that are involved in this economic system. What really resonated with me was your dialogue about people's worth being based on their productivity of labor. In this economic system, what is sad but true, is that we do not see people's livelihoods, but rather, their stations in life in relation to their occupation.
ReplyDeleteMuch like both Brad and Jay are both posing their inquiries about the solution to capitalism, I beg the question whether or not the capitalist system is evolved enough to be color-blind? Personally, I do not see "tweaking" the system as a means of a solution, because the capitalism, as stated in this post, always has "winners" and "losers."
Of course, we do have to acknowledge that capitalism has been the most "successful" economic system as a whole thus far, but the truth is that the "success" of this system is subjective. The racial disparities in our society stand as a true testament as to how broken this system is.